Cyberattackers Alter Implant on 30K Compromised Cisco IOS XE Devices

In the latest in the saga of compromise involving a max-critical Cisco bug that has been exploited as a zero-day as users waited for patches, several security researchers reported observing a sharp decline in the number of infected Cisco IOS XE systems visible to them over the weekend. 

The drop sparked a range of theories as to why, but researchers from Fox-IT on Oct. 23 identified the real reason as having to do with the attacker simply altering the implant, so it is no longer visible via previous fingerprinting methods.

By way of background: The main bug being used in the exploit chain exists in the Web UI of IOS XE (CVE-2023-20198). It ranks 10 out of 10 on the CVSS vulnerability-severity scale, and gives unauthenticated, remote attackers a way to gain initial access to affected devices and create persistent local user accounts on them. 

The exploit method also involves a second zero-day (CVE-2023-20273), which Cisco only discovered while investigating the first one, which allows the attacker to elevate privileges to root and write an implant on the file system. Cisco released updated versions of IOS XE addressing the flaws on Oct. 22, days after disclosure, giving cyberattackers ample opportunity to go after legions of unpatched systems.

Sudden Decline in Compromised Systems

And go after them they did. Security researchers using Shodan, Censys, and other tools last week reported observing what appeared to be a single threat actor infecting tens of thousands of affected Cisco IOS XE devices with an implant for arbitrary code execution. The implants are not persistent, meaning they won’t survive a device reboot.

A sudden and dramatic drop over the weekend in the number of compromised systems visible to researchers caused some to speculate if an unknown grey-hat hacker was quietly removing the attacker’s implant from infected systems. Others wondered if the attacker had moved to another exploit phase, or was doing some sort of clean-up operation to conceal the implant. Another theory was that the attacker was using the implant to reboot systems to get rid of the implant.

But it turns out that nearly 38,000 remain compromised via the two recently disclosed zero-day bugs in the operating system, if one knows where to look.

Altered Cisco Implant

“We have observed that the implant placed on tens of thousands of Cisco devices has been altered to check for an Authorization HTTP header value before responding,” the Fox-IT researchers said on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter. “This explains the much-discussed plummet of identified compromised systems in recent days.” 

By using another fingerprinting method to look for compromised systems, Fox-IT said it identified 37,890 devices with the attackers implant still on them. 

“We strongly advise everyone that has (had) a Cisco IOS XE WebUI exposed to the Internet to perform a forensic triage,” the company added, pointing to its advisory on GitHub for identifying compromised systems.

Researchers from VulnCheck who last week reported seeing thousands of infected systems, were among those who found the compromised devices suddenly disappearing from view over the weekend. CTO Jacob Baines, who initially was among those unsure about what might have happened, says Fox-IT’s take on what happened is correct.

“Over the weekend the attackers changed the way the implant is accessed so the old scanning method was no longer usable,” Baines says. “We’ve just recently altered our scanner to use the new method demonstrated by Fox-IT, and we are seeing essentially what we saw last week: thousands of implanted devices.”

Cisco updated its guidance for detecting the implant on October 23. In a statement to Dark Reading, the company said it released the new indicators of compromise after uncovering a variant of the implant that hinders the identification of compromised systems. “We strongly urge customers to implement the guidance and install the security fix outlined in Cisco’s updated security advisory and Talos blog,” the company said.

Puzzling Cyberattacker Motivations

Baines says the attacker’s motivation for altering the implant is puzzling and completely unexpected. “I think normally, when an attacker is caught, they go quiet and revisit the affected systems when the dust has settled.”

In this case, the attacker is attempting to maintain access to implants that dozens of security companies now know exist. 

“To me, it seems like a game they can’t win,” Baines says. “It seems this username/password update must be a short-term fix so that they can either hold on to the systems for a few more days — and accomplish whatever goal — or just a stopgap until they can insert a more stealthy implant.”

Read More HERE